It was during a hasty pilgrimage in October 1909 to the great Hindu shrines of the various Cathedral cities of the South that the project of the present publication was first formulated. The discovery of an old Sanskrit text of the silpasastras specially dealing with South Indian images in the possession of a hereditary craftsman in Swami Melai (Tanjore District) afforded excellent materials for the study of this school of bronzes which has contributed such interesting figures to the sculpture galleries in every corridor of all the important temples in the South. The discovery of the text, however, entailing, as it did, a hard and strenuous task of interpreting difficult and mutilated technical terms necessarily delayed the preparation of this work. The delay had its advantage in the time that it afforded in collecting photo- graphs of an adequate number of examples so as to interpret and illustrate the leading characteristics of this interesting branch of Indian sculpture.
My ignorance of the Tamil language has disqualified me from obtaining first-hand information on many details relating to the history of the subject. Indeed my lack of information on many important points and vital aspects of the subject has undoubtedly maimed and impaired the utility of this essay. The task which my vain efforts have failed to accomplish should have been reserved for better and competent hands. Unfortunately the modern educated South Indian to whom one looks forward to a complete and scholarly survey of the artistic treasures of their country still continues to cultivate a philistine indifference to the masterpieces of their ancestors.
A large proportion of the photographs reproduced in this volume was taken by or for me expressly for this work. To Dr. Henderson of the Government Museum, Madras, I owe a deep debt for permission to obtain photographs of some of the best specimens in that collection.
The interest which has been recently evinced in the study of Indian Art in its æsthetic aspects has led to a closer enquiry and researches into the various indigenous Schools of Artists which have flourished from time to time in the Indian Continent-researches which have resulted in the discovery of clearly differentiated groups or Schools of sculpture each characterized by qualities which represent æsthetic experiences of a novel character and yet related to one another by that idealism of form and conception which undoubtedly constitutes India's contribution to the Art of the world.
Specimens of old Indian sculpture have survived in ancient temples and shrines in a bewildering variety which still await systematic study.
The author who is the Honorary Secretary of our Society has himself previously touched upon the subject of "Dravidian Sculpture" (Modern Review, January 1912) and "South Indian Portrait-sculpture (Ibid, January 1915). He now follows it up with the present work in which he has collected mate- rials for the study of South Indian Bronzes and has made for the first time a survey of this branch of the wide-spreading Indian æsthetic field. His study of Shaivite sculpture is based on, original sources, namely three Sanskrit manuscripts dealing with the Sculptors' canons-Kasyapiya, Agastiya and Brahmiya which are still unpublished and have not been utilised by any previous writer.
According to the plan which the author has followed in dealing with the subject matter he has refrained from commenting on the merits of individual work, but has rather attempted to understand the conditions and the atmosphere in which these works have been produced. In the descriptive notes to the plates are appended for each icon the texts from the sculp- tor's handbooks which are authorities for the identification of the subject-matter of each conception. The texts have thus afforded invaluable materials for the study of South Indian iconography which is, as yet, an uninvestigated field. For, after Ziegenbalg (Genealogy of the South Indian Gods, Madras, 1869) no serious attempt has been made to survey or study the South Indian Pantheon. The Government of Madras has instructed the Assistant Superintendent for Epigraphy to prepare a hand-book on the "Iconography of Southern India". This publication will no doubt fulfil a long- felt want. In the Annales du Muse'e Guimet, Archaeology du Sud de l'Inde, Iconographies, tome II has recently been publish- ed. Mr. T. Gopinath Rao of Travancore is also publishing a treatise on the same subject. In the examples dealt with in the present volume are included the splendid masterpieces dis covered in Polonnaruwa, Ceylon. The author is of opinion that these interesting figures must be regarded as essentially South Indian in their conception and origin and can hardly be classed with the works of Sinhalese craftsmen. On the other hand, he has excluded the pre-historic bronzes discovered at Tinnevelly as in their character and origin, they are, according to his view, unrelated to the great School of Shaivite Sculpture, to which "South Indian Bronzes" as now understood specially relate, and therefore do not come within the scope of the present monograph.
It has been the fashion amongst European art critics to decry the merits of Brahmanical Sculpture on the ground of the alleged monstrosities of the Hindu pauranic conceptions, which, it has been said, are incapable of artistic treatment. The examples collected in this volume will, it is hoped, help to dispel such misconceptions and to refute the unjust criticisms which they have engendered, and will further a juster appreciation of the fact that Indian Sculpture is not a freak of Asiatic barbarism, but is a worthy representative of a school of æsthetic performance as logical, articulate and highly developed as those of any country in Europe, ancient or modern.
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy
Send as free online greeting card
Email a Friend
Manage Wishlist